I use Chapter 17 of Economics for
Dummies to smash ten really bad pieces of economic thinking---or,
rather, misthinking. I choose these particular ten because they
come up all the time in the media and because they often pop out of the
mouths of politicians----who often, I suspect, know better, but who
nevertheless use them to fool people into supporting the policies that the
politicians are trying to advance.
Here are the ten fallacies and some links for each
one.
The Lump of Labor Fallacy
Here is a rather T'd off
Bruce Bartlett
poking holes in this fallacy and how silly the French are for making it a
cornerstone of their national economic policy. And while you're at it,
read this other article by a kinder, gentler
Mr. Bartlett on the fallacy.
The World is Facing an Overpopulation Problem
Ever since Thomas Malthus published his
Essay on the
Principle of Population about 200 years ago, dismal people have been
arguing that the world is facing an overpopulation crisis. Why?
Because Malthus proposed a theory of population growth in which the
population would tend to grow faster than the food supply---thereby
constantly forcing us to live at subsistence.
Fortunately, he was wrong. While it is true that
the population did grow fast for awhile as modern medicine and sanitation
became available and death rates dropped, it turned out that birthrates
quickly followed suit anywhere those innovations became widespread.
This change to a situation of low birthrates is called the
Demographic Transition.
It has now led to the historically unprecedented
situation that in the developed world (and soon in the developing world)
women are having far fewer children than is necessary to replace the
population. Put differently, the world population should max out no
later than 2050 at about 8 or 9 billion people before rapidly declining--as
you can read about in this
article
that was published in Nature, as well as the independently
generated estimates produced by the
United Nations.
These low birthrates are going to cause a big mess for
economic policy in coming years. Here is a nice recent
IMF study (as a pdf file) reviewing the likely economic consequences of
the coming population crash---especially the problems that countries are
going to have fulfilling their retirement benefit promises to senior
citizens when there will be very few workers paying the taxes necessary to
pay finance those benefits.
The Fallacy of Confusing Sequence with Causation
Here's a nice article on this fallacy that's posted
over at the Skeptic's Dictionary.
Protectionism is the Best Solution to Foreign
Competition
Here's a nice skewering of the protectionist argument
by Thomas Sowell.
And here's an article by
Larry Kudlow. And of course, here is the eminent
Jagdish
Bhagwati tearing protectionism to shreds, but doing it politely.
The Fallacy of Composition
Here's a page on this fallacy put up by the
Adam Smith
Institute.
If it's Worth Doing, Do it 100%
Here is
Thomas Sowell
tearing to shreds the idea that if something is good, you should do it as
much as possible. Because of diminishing returns, such a policy is
very stupid.
Free Markets are Dangerously Unstable
Here's an excellent essay by
Kevin Dowd
explaining how financial instability is not the result of free markets but
rather the result of interferences with free markets. (It's a pdf
file.)
Low Foreign Wages Mean that Rich Countries Can't
Compete
Here is the only article you'll every have to read
about this by the indispensable
Thomas Sowell.
Tax Rates Don't Affect Work Effort
Here's a
Bruce Bartlett piece with lots of nice links; the essay summarizes the
case that lower taxes lead people to work more. And here's a
Larry Kudlow piece summarizing the arguments that lower taxes spur work
effort and economic growth.
Forgetting the Policies Have Unintended
Consequences, Too
Thomas Sowell has a whole book on this problem:
Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One
. Here's a nice
review of the book by
Dutch Martin; it
summarizes just what Sowell is getting at in the book, the idea that people
too often make economic policies to fix one problem without considering if
their "solution" will create other, even bigger problems, too.